Aiming for the good of our residents and the future. Quite a few of them started a counter-campaign in Sogni, which became visible through local activities. Mounting resistance must be directed by the individual's subjective feelings of some kind? Perhaps for fear of missing out on something designed specifically for the ego? A change that might seem like a threat to the local community? The sentiment was shared by many people and people built a community and gradually formed a flock. Emerging groups with emerging discourses, produced by the few. Repetitions that hit the subjective feelings of more people. Self-esteem rose among the promoters and they carried a common flag and built political support with a party that “believes in all of Norway.” It allowed society to develop. Meters of texts distributed on available channels describe the opposition to the parliamentary decision and its opinion on creating a better, shared future for all. The opposition was created.
Then one can ask whether the individual in a democracy supports the parliamentary decision, or whether the person has easily allowed himself to be infected by domestic forces, with his own arguments, when an opinion is formed. Were you influenced by the few who opposed you from day one?
What answers can the “knowledge base” provide if one wonders what different psychological forces influence the process of change, such as what the municipal reform in Sogni represents? The following response has been generated.
Resistance to change: Many may suffer from uncertainty and fear of the unknown, which may lead to resistance to changes in the municipal structure. Optimism and opportunities: Some may see reform as an opportunity for positive development, increased efficiency, and improved services, which may lead to optimism and support.
Identity and belonging: Changes in municipal structure can challenge people's sense of belonging and identity linked to their local community. Social influence: The way others in the community react to reform, whether positive or negative, can influence individuals' opinions through social influence.
Stress and anxiety: Uncertainty and change processes can lead to stress and anxiety in individuals, especially those who are unsure of the consequences of reform.
It is important to recognize these psychological forces in order to develop effective strategies to deal with the challenges and opportunities related to municipal reform in Sogni. Open dialogue, clear communication and community engagement can help address these psychological aspects in a constructive way.”
In 2016, a modest portion of eligible voters in Sogni gave their advisory vote. Politicians were in favor of consolidation, but then backed away from it. What might be the reason? Tactics? There were divisions in the parties and many voted against their convictions. The result was 16 to 11, and they were able to curb reform.
I understand that the resulting answer of “Kunnskapsbasen” means that psychology and its wondrous entity influences the degree to which a person is “injured” negatively or positively. The way forward must remain one of taking responsibility and thinking about the future on behalf of young and old. There is no doubt. Parliament wanted to contribute to a common future, built on insight and knowledge. Personal interests were not “contagious” in 2015. Then soon the time will come for a new ballot for each of us. I hope you choose something that builds on today's “framework.”
“Explorer. Unapologetic entrepreneur. Alcohol fanatic. Certified writer. Wannabe tv evangelist. Twitter fanatic. Student. Web scholar. Travel buff.”
