Football, Arsenal | Arsenal crisis could be Martin’s nightmare

Mikel Arteta, 39, saw the qualities and was the man who brought Martin Odegaard, 22, to London. Based on Arsenal’s misery, the question is whether he will be there when Martin returns from the national team rally.

Comments Expresses the opinion of the author.

Three groups, NULL Points, no goals and nine setbacks. Arsenal club never happened. It is by far the worst in the 2021/2022 Premier League.

At the same time, it is an initial crisis unparalleled in the club’s proud history.

Everyone who follows football at this level knows what often happens during crises in training.

Martin Odegaard, who went to Arsenal for security and predictability after five years as one of Real Madrid’s nomads, is in the midst of this crisis.

This was not the way it was supposed to be.

Click here to subscribe to newsletters from The Norwegian Discussion

after double A match against Brentford away from home (0-2), an apologetic loss against Chelsea at UAE soil (0-2). And a useless performance against Manchester City in the Etihad (0-5).Director Mikel Arteta is hanging by a thread. The kick was already mentioned even though we are only three games into the season.

Last season was not good, Arsenal are out of Europe for the first time in 26 years, and now it is worse.

In other words, it cannot continue.

Mikel Arteta Island Martin Odegaard’s man at the club. It was he who brought the Norwegian on loan and gave him playing time and 20 matches in the second half of last season. It was he who went into the transformation that came true on August 20th.

See also  - They really wanted me - VG

So speculation about Arteta’s future is creating uncertainty and it could be bad news for Martin, which is the last thing he needs, especially now that Norway needs Martin.

Nobody knows what will happen when a new manager comes to the door.

Read more comments from MortenP

Arsenal’s first match After the national team break, Norwich at his home in London. They also have zero points after three games. The difference between them and Arsenal is that they scored a goal.

He says himself: Arsenal must win, and preferably play a match that gives hope for a better future.

Everything else and Mikel Arteta is over.

Chelsea’s death was Arsenal ball 35 percent of the time, resulting in three finishes on goal. Against Manchester City, they could barely borrow the ball. Possession of the ball was 81-19 in 90 minutes, and in the second half it was 9-10.

The latter because the Arsenal players weren’t interested in anything.

It looked like they were playing for a new manager.

Read more from the Norwegian discussion

Arsenal was It only ended against Manchester City. You did not go to the target. Manchester City scored 25. Other numbers support and reinforce the seriousness and how weak Mikel Arteta’s mission is in breaking the national team.

Blocked shots often relate to effort, will and intensity in the defensive match, and at Al Ittihad on Saturday it was 7-0 Manchester City.

For corner stats, you can multiply the numbers by two, 14-0.

she says So it doesn’t last long. It is unsustainable, as it is called. It only points in one direction, toward a worse season than the bad season that ended in May.

See also  A complete rift in the karate community - federations blame each other - NRK Sport - Sports news, results and broadcast schedule

Martin Odegaard was with him then, and with him now, and on the contract he signed, he says he will be at Arsenal until the summer of 2026.

Again, this was not the way it was supposed to be.

Najuma Ojukwu

Najuma Ojukwu

"Infuriatingly humble internet trailblazer. Twitter buff. Beer nerd. Bacon scholar. Coffee practitioner."

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *